Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey  InsuranceRisk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance
VS
PortoPorto
Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey  Insurance

Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance

21 Commerce Drive, Cranford, 07016, US

Last Update: 26/06/2026

View Profile
677/1000Weak

We manage insurance and employee benefit programs with complex requirements. We dig deep into clients’ coverage matters, identify risk exposures, and determine how to best manage and finance them. Our focus is not only on the price of insurance but also on disast...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:20
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Porto

Porto

Avenida Rio Branco, 1489, Sao Paulo, SP, BR, 01205-001

Last Update: 19/05/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://porto.vc/linkedin
638/1000Poor

A Porto é mais que uma seguradora, é um ecossistema de soluções de serviços de proteção com tecnologia embarcada, para melhorar e facilitar a experiência do cliente. Com mais de 70 anos de mercado, a atuação da companhia se concentra hoje em quatro pilares estratégicos ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:24,131
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey  Insurance

Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Porto

Porto

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance has 31.03% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Porto in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Porto (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Porto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey  Insurance

Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RIS1782434002
Porto

Porto

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
POR3692036090725
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
POR4102041102125

FAQ

Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and Porto company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and Porto company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and Porto company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and Porto company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and Porto company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and Porto company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and Porto company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and Porto company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and Porto company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and Porto company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and Porto company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance and Porto, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance and Porto, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance or Porto ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance or Porto ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance and Porto, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance and Porto, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA