Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey  InsuranceRisk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance
VS
AIGAIG
Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey  Insurance

Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance

21 Commerce Drive, Cranford, 07016, US

Last Update: 26/06/2026

View Profile
677/1000Weak

We manage insurance and employee benefit programs with complex requirements. We dig deep into clients’ coverage matters, identify risk exposures, and determine how to best manage and finance them. Our focus is not only on the price of insurance but also on disast...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:20
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
AIG

AIG

1271 Avenue of the Americas, Floor 41, New York, NY, US, 10020-1304

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.aig.com
806/1000Good

American International Group, Inc. (NYSE: AIG) is a leading global insurance organization. AIG provides insurance solutions that help businesses and individuals in approximately 190 countries and jurisdictions protect their assets and manage risks through AIG operations...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:27,538
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey  Insurance

Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AIG

AIG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance has 36.71% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AIG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AIG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AIG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey  Insurance

Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RIS1782434002
AIG

AIG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and AIG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and AIG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and AIG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and AIG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and AIG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and AIG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and AIG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and AIG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and AIG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and AIG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance company and AIG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance and AIG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance and AIG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance or AIG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance or AIG ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance and AIG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Risk Strategies / Meeker Sharkey Insurance and AIG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA