Comparison Overview

Rijksoverheid

VS

FEMA

Rijksoverheid

Turfmarkt 147 The Hague, South Holland 2511 DP, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
www.werkenvoornederland.nl

Op vrijwel alle werkterreinen en functieniveaus biedt de Rijksoverheid leuke en boeiende banen. Vacatures zijn bovendien in heel Nederland te vinden. Waar voor jou precies de mogelijkheden liggen hangt onder andere samen met je vooropleiding. Zowel met een mbo- of hbo-diploma als met een universitaire studie kun je bij de Rijksoverheid uitstekend terecht. Als je eerst eens kennis wilt maken, dat kan ook. Bijvoorbeeld in de vorm van een rijkstraineeship, financial traineeship, audit traineeship, juridisch (vak)traineeship of stage. Of je nu een doener of meer een denker bent, een adviseur of een ondersteunende kracht. Heb je bijvoorbeeld leidinggevende aspiraties, organisatorisch talent of verdiep je je liever in nieuwe dossiers over onderwijs, kunst of landbouw? Bij de Rijksoverheid kun je alle kanten op.

NAICS: 922
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

FEMA

500 C Street SW, None, Washington, DC, US, 20472
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 550 and 599
http://www.fema.gov

Welcome to the official LinkedIn page for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). When disaster strikes, America looks to FEMA to support survivors and first responders in communities all across the country. This page provides career related information, job announcements and relevant updates for the agency’s current and future workforce. FEMA fosters innovation, rewards performance and creativity, and provides challenges on a routine basis with a well-skilled, knowledgeable, and high performance workforce. Join our mission to support Americans when they need you most!

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 19,641
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rijksoverheid.jpeg
Rijksoverheid
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fema.jpeg
FEMA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rijksoverheid
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FEMA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rijksoverheid in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

FEMA has 261.45% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Rijksoverheid (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rijksoverheid cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FEMA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FEMA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rijksoverheid.jpeg
Rijksoverheid
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fema.jpeg
FEMA
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Citrix Remote Access Software, Lateral Movement, Privilege Escalation
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft, Potential Sabotage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Citrix Remote Access Software, Lateral Movement within Network
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Credentials, Exploitation of Citrix Remote Desktop Software, Lateral Movement via VPN Software
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Rijksoverheid company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FEMA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

FEMA company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Rijksoverheid company has not reported any.

In the current year, FEMA company has reported more cyber incidents than Rijksoverheid company.

FEMA company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Rijksoverheid company has not reported such incidents publicly.

FEMA company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Rijksoverheid company has not reported such incidents publicly.

FEMA company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Rijksoverheid company has not reported such incidents publicly.

FEMA company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Rijksoverheid company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Rijksoverheid nor FEMA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

FEMA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rijksoverheid company.

FEMA company employs more people globally than Rijksoverheid company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Rijksoverheid nor FEMA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rijksoverheid nor FEMA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rijksoverheid nor FEMA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rijksoverheid nor FEMA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rijksoverheid nor FEMA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rijksoverheid nor FEMA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Authorization (CWE-285) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation (CAPEC-233) by allowing an authenticated user to bypass intended permission restrictions via a crafted HTTP request. This allows an attacker who lacks the live queries - read permission to successfully retrieve the list of live queries.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15.1, it was possible to overwrite Git configuration remotely and override some of its behavior. Version 5.15.1 fixes the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Elasticsearch can allow an authenticated user with snapshot restore privileges to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of memory and a denial of service (DoS) via crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can allow a low-privileged authenticated user to cause Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130) of computing resources and a denial of service (DoS) of the Kibana process via a crafted HTTP request.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (CWE-79) allows an unauthenticated user to embed a malicious script in content that will be served to web browsers causing cross-site scripting (XSS) (CAPEC-63) via a vulnerability a function handler in the Vega AST evaluator.

Published
Date
2025-12-18
Updated
Date
2025-12-18
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References