Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd.RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd.
VS
TDCXTDCX
RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd.

RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd.

610, 6th Floor, , Elegance Tower Jasola District Center, , New Delhi - , Delhi, IN, 110025

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

Rigel Marine Services Pvt. Ltd. was incorporated on 8th July 2011 and is equipped to manage the whole spectrum of vessels operating worldwide. Rigel Marine’s Safety Management System is audited and certified by leading International Classifications society Class NKK, Ri...

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:106
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TDCX

TDCX

750D Chai Chee Road, Singapore, SG, 469000

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tdcx.com
783/1000Fair

Singapore-headquartered TDCX provides transformative digital CX solutions, enabling world-leading and disruptive brands to acquire new customers, to build customer loyalty, and to protect their online communities. TDCX helps clients achieve their customer experience a...

NAICS:541615
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:16,508
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd.

RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TDCX

TDCX

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Outsourcing and Offshoring Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TDCX in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TDCX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TDCX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd.

RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TDCX

TDCX

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. company and TDCX company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. company and TDCX company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. company and TDCX company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. company and TDCX company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. company and TDCX company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. company and TDCX company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. company and TDCX company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. company and TDCX company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. company and TDCX company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. company and TDCX company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. company and TDCX company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. and TDCX, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. and TDCX, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. or TDCX ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. or TDCX ?
Between RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. and TDCX, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between RIGEL MARINE SERVICES Pvt. Ltd. and TDCX, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA