Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Richardson RFPDRichardson RFPD
VS
Marvell TechnologyMarvell Technology
Richardson RFPD

Richardson RFPD

1950 S Batavia Ave, Geneva, Illinois, 60134, US

Last Update: 30/12/2025

View Profile
755/1000Fair

Richardson RFPD, an Arrow Electronics company, is a global leader in the RF, wireless, IoT and power technologies markets. It brings relationships with many of the industry’s top radio frequency and power component suppliers. Whether it’s designing components or enginee...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:301
Subsidiaries:50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Marvell Technology

Marvell Technology

5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, 95054, US

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.marvell.com
836/1000Good

We believe that infrastructure powers progress. That execution is as essential as innovation. That better collaboration builds better technology. At Marvell, We go all in with you. Focused and determined, we unite behind your goals as our own. We leverage our unrivaled...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:10,728
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Richardson RFPD

Richardson RFPD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marvell Technology

Marvell Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Richardson RFPD in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marvell Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Richardson RFPD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Richardson RFPD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marvell Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marvell Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Richardson RFPD

Richardson RFPD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Marvell Technology

Marvell Technology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Richardson RFPD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Richardson RFPD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Richardson RFPD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Richardson RFPD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Richardson RFPD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Richardson RFPD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Richardson RFPD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Richardson RFPD company and Marvell Technology company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Richardson RFPD company and Marvell Technology company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Richardson RFPD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Richardson RFPD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Richardson RFPD and Marvell Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Richardson RFPD and Marvell Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Richardson RFPD or Marvell Technology ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Richardson RFPD or Marvell Technology ?
Between Richardson RFPD and Marvell Technology, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Richardson RFPD and Marvell Technology, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2