Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support servicesRGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services
VS
Republic ServicesRepublic Services
RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services

RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services

63 Wessel Road, Rivonia, Johannesburg, Gauteng, undefined, ZA

Last Update: 20/11/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.rgmenv.co.za
749/1000Moderate

Engineering, Science and Technical support services

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:10
Subsidiaries:124
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Republic Services

Republic Services

18500 N. Allied Way, Phoenix, 85054, US

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
816/1000Good

Republic Services provides the most complete set of recycling, waste and environmental solutions from a single-source provider. We partner with customers to help them achieve their sustainability goals, driving both environmental and economic sustainability. We offer ad...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:20,574
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services

RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Republic Services

Republic Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Republic Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Republic Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Republic Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services

RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Republic Services

Republic Services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services company and Republic Services company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services company and Republic Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services company and Republic Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services company and Republic Services company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services company and Republic Services company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services company and Republic Services company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services company and Republic Services company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services company and Republic Services company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services company and Republic Services company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services company and Republic Services company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services company and Republic Services company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services and Republic Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services and Republic Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services or Republic Services ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services or Republic Services ?
Between RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services and Republic Services, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between RGM Environmental, Science and Technical support services and Republic Services, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94426
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.5.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /jobgroup/insert. This manipulation of the argument Name causes cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94425
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Moore Threads MTT S80 Driver Package 340.150. The affected element is the function sub_140006F0C in the library mtdispkm64.sys of the component IOCTL Handler. The manipulation results in improper privilege management. Attacking locally is a requirement. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2
CVE-2026-94627
SUMMARY

vLLM Mooncake connector through 0.29.0 fails to properly manage GPU KV cache block ownership when concurrent child requests share a single transfer ID in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Attackers can trigger GPU memory exhaustion by submitting completion requests with multiple prompts, causing orphaned KV cache blocks to accumulate until process restart and eventually preventing legitimate requests from executing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94626
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to validate the tp_size parameter in kv_transfer_params on OpenAI-compatible completion endpoints, allowing attackers to allocate unbounded memory. Attackers can supply arbitrary tp_size values in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments to exhaust memory and trigger kernel OOM-kill of the decode worker process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94625
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in MooncakeConnector where rejected prefill requests create ownerless transfer placeholders that are never reclaimed. Attackers can send rejected requests to exhaust sender task pools, causing valid requests to be delayed by up to 480 seconds while health checks continue returning success.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9