Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Rexel BelgiumRexel Belgium
VS
FoxconnFoxconn
Rexel Belgium

Rexel Belgium

Zuiderlaan 91, Zellik, 1731, BE

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://http://www.rexel.be
749/1000Moderate

Rexel is de globale marktleider in de distributie van elektrische producten en oplossingen voor de industriële, residentiële en tertiaire markt. In ons indrukwekkend productaanbod vindt u het meest innovatieve op het gebied van elektrisch materiaal, verlichting, beveil...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:294
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Foxconn

Foxconn

US

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.foxconn.com
564/1000Very Poor

Established in Taiwan in 1974, Hon Hai Technology Group (Foxconn) (2317: Taiwan) is the world’s largest electronics manufacturer. Foxconn is also the leading technological solution provider, and it continuously leverages its expertise in software and hardware to integra...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:99,265
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Rexel Belgium

Rexel Belgium

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Foxconn

Foxconn

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rexel Belgium in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Foxconn has 296.04% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Rexel Belgium (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rexel Belgium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Foxconn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foxconn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Rexel Belgium

Rexel Belgium

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Foxconn

Foxconn

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
GOOFOXAPP1778617574
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UNIWESFOX1780562007
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ANTFOX7-ECARGIT1781576848

FAQ

Between Rexel Belgium company and Foxconn company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Rexel Belgium company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Rexel Belgium company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Rexel Belgium company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Rexel Belgium company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Rexel Belgium company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Rexel Belgium company and Foxconn company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Rexel Belgium company and Foxconn company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Rexel Belgium company and Foxconn company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Rexel Belgium company and Foxconn company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Rexel Belgium company and Foxconn company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Rexel Belgium and Foxconn, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Rexel Belgium and Foxconn, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Rexel Belgium or Foxconn ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Rexel Belgium or Foxconn ?
Between Rexel Belgium and Foxconn, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Rexel Belgium and Foxconn, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-108680
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows any authenticated user to send template notifications by calling POST /sys/api/sendTemplateAnnouncement. Low-privileged attackers can supply forged sender, recipients, title, and template parameters to deliver messages appearing to come from admin or system accounts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108679
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the sendBusAnnouncement handler of SystemApiController that allows any authenticated user to send announcements without the required permissions. Low-privileged attackers can POST crafted bodies to /sys/api/sendBusAnnouncement with forged sender, recipients, title and content to deliver spoofed admin or system messages for phishing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108678
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the queryUserRoles handler of SystemApiController that lets authenticated users read any user's role codes. Low-privileged attackers can send GET requests to /sys/api/queryUserRoles with an arbitrary username to enumerate role assignments and identify administrator accounts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108677
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in GET /sys/api/getUserByName that allows low-privileged authenticated users to retrieve any user's stored password value. Attackers can decrypt the AES-CBC protected response using the hard-coded key exposed by /sys/getEncryptedString to obtain administrators' password ciphertexts for offline guessing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-108676
SUMMARY

JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the SysAnnouncementController downLoadFiles handler that allows low-privileged authenticated users to download announcement attachments. Attackers can supply a known announcement id to retrieve a ZIP of attachments from unreleased announcements or those addressed only to other users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-10
UPDATED
Date2026-10-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8