Comparison Overview
Revolut

Revolut
30 S Colonnade, London, E14 5HX, GB
Last Update: 22/04/2026
People deserve more from their money. More visibility, more control, and more freedom. Since 2015, Revolut has been on a mission to deliver just that. Our powerhouse of products help our 65+ million customers get more from their money every day. As we continue our ligh...

Mahindra Finance
Dr. G.M. Bhosale Marg, P.K. Kurne Chowk, Worli, Mumbai, 400018, IN
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited (Mahindra Finance), part of the Mahindra Group, is one of India's leading non-banking finance companies. Focused on the rural and semi-urban sector, the Company has over 10 million customers and has an AUM of over USD 11 B...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Revolut







Mahindra Finance






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Revolut in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mahindra Finance in 2026.
Incident History - Revolut (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Revolut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Mahindra Finance (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mahindra Finance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Revolut

Mahindra Finance
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.