Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Revolent GroupRevolent Group
VS
Infinite Computer SolutionsInfinite Computer Solutions
Revolent Group

Revolent Group

Plantation Place South, 60 Great Tower Street, London, Greater London, GB, EC3R 5AZ

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://revolentgroup.com/
752/1000Fair

Revolent is a world-leading tech talent creation and reskilling company making a real impact on the AWS, Databricks, Google Cloud, Microsoft, Salesforce, and Snowflake ecosystems across Europe, North America, and APAC. As part of Tenth Revolution Group, our purpose is...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:134
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Infinite Computer Solutions

Infinite Computer Solutions

Tower Oaks Blvd, #700, Rockville, Maryland, US, 20852

Last Update: 17/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.infinite.com/
759/1000Fair

Infinite is a global leader in technology modernization, next-gen IT services and solutions, and digital engineering, with over two decades of experience helping clients turn digital transformation into business value. Leveraging an AI-first approach, we combine leading...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:13,638
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Revolent Group

Revolent Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Infinite Computer Solutions

Infinite Computer Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Revolent Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Infinite Computer Solutions has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Revolent Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Revolent Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Infinite Computer Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Infinite Computer Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Revolent Group

Revolent Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Infinite Computer Solutions

Infinite Computer Solutions

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CITINF1781735198

FAQ

Between Revolent Group company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Revolent Group company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Revolent Group company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Revolent Group company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Revolent Group company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Revolent Group company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Revolent Group company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Revolent Group company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Revolent Group company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Revolent Group company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Revolent Group company and Infinite Computer Solutions company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Revolent Group and Infinite Computer Solutions, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Revolent Group and Infinite Computer Solutions, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Revolent Group or Infinite Computer Solutions ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Revolent Group or Infinite Computer Solutions ?
Between Revolent Group and Infinite Computer Solutions, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Revolent Group and Infinite Computer Solutions, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA