Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Retina-X Studios, LLCRetina-X Studios, LLC
VS
Expedia GroupExpedia Group
Retina-X Studios, LLC

Retina-X Studios, LLC

13453 N. Main Street, Suite 201, Jacksonville, Florida, US, 32218

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.retinax.com/
682/1000Weak

Retina X Studios helps parents and employers monitor their underage child or employee on devices they own and have proper consent to monitor. Parents, companies, corporate, government and schools have helped protect their children and keep employees on the right track w...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:3
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
Expedia Group

Expedia Group

1111 Expedia Group Way W., Seattle, 98119, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
796/1000Fair

At Expedia Group (NASDAQ: EXPE), we believe travel is a force for good – it opens minds, builds connections, and bridges divides. We create transformative tech that enables unforgettable experiences for all travelers, everywhere. Our trusted family of brands are known a...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:21,768
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Retina-X Studios, LLC

Retina-X Studios, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Expedia Group

Expedia Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

Retina-X Studios, LLC has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Expedia Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Retina-X Studios, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Retina-X Studios, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Expedia Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Expedia Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Retina-X Studios, LLC

Retina-X Studios, LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RETMSPMUKUMO1770688652
🔒 Incident : Malware
RET20427622
Expedia Group

Expedia Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Retina-X Studios, LLC company and Expedia Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Retina-X Studios, LLC company and Expedia Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Retina-X Studios, LLC company and Expedia Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Retina-X Studios, LLC company and Expedia Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Retina-X Studios, LLC company and Expedia Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Retina-X Studios, LLC company and Expedia Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Retina-X Studios, LLC company and Expedia Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Retina-X Studios, LLC company and Expedia Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Retina-X Studios, LLC company and Expedia Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Retina-X Studios, LLC company and Expedia Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Retina-X Studios, LLC company and Expedia Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Retina-X Studios, LLC and Expedia Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Retina-X Studios, LLC and Expedia Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Retina-X Studios, LLC or Expedia Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Retina-X Studios, LLC or Expedia Group ?
Between Retina-X Studios, LLC and Expedia Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Retina-X Studios, LLC and Expedia Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9