Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Retail Merchandising Services, Inc.Retail Merchandising Services, Inc.
VS
SPAR InternationalSPAR International
Retail Merchandising Services, Inc.

Retail Merchandising Services, Inc.

8801 Brooklyn Blvd, Brooklyn Park, US

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.rmservicing.com
685/1000Weak

Since 1985, Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. (RMS) has provided in-store visual merchandising and display solutions and has become a national leader in the merchandising services industry by delivering exceptional value to our clients. We offer expanded national cov...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:803
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
SPAR International

SPAR International

Rokin 99, Amsterdam, 1012KM, NL

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
792/1000Fair

The worldwide SPAR organisation operates over 13,800 SPAR stores in 48 countries on four continents, meeting the needs of over 14,7 million consumers every day. The SPAR concept was established on the basis of wholesalers and retailers working in partnership to the be...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:11,020
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Retail Merchandising Services, Inc.

Retail Merchandising Services, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SPAR International

SPAR International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. has 45.65% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SPAR International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SPAR International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SPAR International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Retail Merchandising Services, Inc.

Retail Merchandising Services, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RET1774103057
SPAR International

SPAR International

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. company and SPAR International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. company and SPAR International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. company and SPAR International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. company and SPAR International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. company and SPAR International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. company and SPAR International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. company and SPAR International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. company and SPAR International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. company and SPAR International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. company and SPAR International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. company and SPAR International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. and SPAR International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. and SPAR International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. or SPAR International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. or SPAR International ?
Between Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. and SPAR International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Retail Merchandising Services, Inc. and SPAR International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2