Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Restaurant Brands InternationalRestaurant Brands International
VS
SyscoSysco
Restaurant Brands International

Restaurant Brands International

130 King St W, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5X 2A2

Last Update: 13/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.rbi.com
725/1000Moderate

Restaurant Brands International Inc. is one of the world's largest quick service restaurant companies with nearly $45 billion in annual system-wide sales and over 32,000 restaurants in more than 120 countries and territories. RBI owns four of the world's most prominent ...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:9,280
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2
Sysco

Sysco

1390 Enclave Parkway, Houston, 77079, US

Last Update: 11/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.sysco.com
740/1000Moderate

Sysco is the global leader in selling, marketing and distributing food and related products to customers who prepare meals away from home. This includes restaurants, healthcare and educational facilities, lodging establishments, entertainment venues, and more. Sysco ope...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:32,467
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Restaurant Brands International

Restaurant Brands International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sysco

Sysco

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Restaurant Brands International in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sysco in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Restaurant Brands International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Restaurant Brands International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sysco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sysco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Restaurant Brands International

Restaurant Brands International

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RES1202112091125
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MCD344071125
🔒 Incident : Breach
GRUPOPRES1769017007
Sysco

Sysco

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SYS5792657090725
🔒 Incident : Breach
SYS222728523
🔒 Incident : Breach
SYS351072625

FAQ

Between Restaurant Brands International company and Sysco company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Restaurant Brands International company and Sysco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Restaurant Brands International company and Sysco company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Restaurant Brands International company and Sysco company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Restaurant Brands International company and Sysco company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Restaurant Brands International company and Sysco company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Restaurant Brands International company and Sysco company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Restaurant Brands International company and Sysco company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Restaurant Brands International company and Sysco company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Restaurant Brands International company and Sysco company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Restaurant Brands International company and Sysco company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Restaurant Brands International and Sysco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Restaurant Brands International and Sysco, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Restaurant Brands International or Sysco ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Restaurant Brands International or Sysco ?
Between Restaurant Brands International and Sysco, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Restaurant Brands International and Sysco, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA