Comparison Overview

Restaurant Brands International

VS

Coca-Cola Consolidated

Restaurant Brands International

130 King St W, None, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5X 2A2
Last Update: 2025-11-20
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rbi.com

Restaurant Brands International Inc. is one of the world's largest quick service restaurant companies with nearly $45 billion in annual system-wide sales and over 32,000 restaurants in more than 120 countries and territories. RBI owns four of the world's most prominent and iconic quick service restaurant brands – TIM HORTONS®, BURGER KING®, POPEYES®, and FIREHOUSE SUBS®. These independently operated brands have been serving their respective guests, franchisees and communities for decades. Through its Restaurant Brands for Good framework, RBI is improving sustainable outcomes related to its food, the planet, and people and communities.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 8,688
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Coca-Cola Consolidated

4100 Coca-Cola Plaza, None, Charlotte, NC, US, 28211
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.CokeConsolidated.com

Coca-Cola Consolidated is the largest Coca-Cola bottler in the United States. Our Purpose is to honor God in all we do, serve others, pursue excellence, and grow profitably. For over 120 years, we have been deeply committed to the consumers, customers, and communities we serve and are passionate about the broad portfolio of beverages and services we offer. We make, sell, and distribute beverages of The Coca-Cola Company and other partner companies in more than 300 brands and flavors across 14 states and the District of Columbia to approximately 60 million consumers. Headquartered in Charlotte, N.C., Coca-Cola Consolidated is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “COKE.” More information about the Company is available at www.cokeconsolidated.com. Follow Coca-Cola Consolidated on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and LinkedIn.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 14,248
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/restaurant-brands-international.jpeg
Restaurant Brands International
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cocacolaconsolidated.jpeg
Coca-Cola Consolidated
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Restaurant Brands International
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Coca-Cola Consolidated
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

Restaurant Brands International has 143.9% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coca-Cola Consolidated in 2025.

Incident History — Restaurant Brands International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Restaurant Brands International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Coca-Cola Consolidated (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coca-Cola Consolidated cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/restaurant-brands-international.jpeg
Restaurant Brands International
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hard-coded Credentials, Plain-text Passwords in Emails, Unrestricted API Access, Default/Weak Passwords (e.g., 'admin')
Motivation: Ethical Hacking / Responsible Disclosure
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cocacolaconsolidated.jpeg
Coca-Cola Consolidated
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Coca-Cola Consolidated company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Restaurant Brands International company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Restaurant Brands International company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Coca-Cola Consolidated company has not reported any.

In the current year, Restaurant Brands International company has reported more cyber incidents than Coca-Cola Consolidated company.

Neither Coca-Cola Consolidated company nor Restaurant Brands International company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Restaurant Brands International company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Coca-Cola Consolidated company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Coca-Cola Consolidated company nor Restaurant Brands International company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Restaurant Brands International company nor Coca-Cola Consolidated company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Restaurant Brands International nor Coca-Cola Consolidated holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Restaurant Brands International company nor Coca-Cola Consolidated company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Coca-Cola Consolidated company employs more people globally than Restaurant Brands International company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Services.

Neither Restaurant Brands International nor Coca-Cola Consolidated holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Restaurant Brands International nor Coca-Cola Consolidated holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Restaurant Brands International nor Coca-Cola Consolidated holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Restaurant Brands International nor Coca-Cola Consolidated holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Restaurant Brands International nor Coca-Cola Consolidated holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Restaurant Brands International nor Coca-Cola Consolidated holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References