Comparison Overview
Residentia Group

Residentia Group
165 Barkly Ave, Burnley, Victoria, 3121, AU
Last Update: 17/01/2026
Residentia Group was formed within Australia in 2014 by a passionate team of appliance industry and retail experts. The company’s primary aim is to partner with retailers to develop, source and build leading appliance product ranges and brands. The company focuses on i...

Rexel
13, Boulevard du Fort de Vaux, Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75017
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Rexel, worldwide expert in the multichannel professional distribution of products and services for the energy world, addresses three main markets: residential, commercial, and industrial. The Group supports its residential, commercial, and industrial customers by provid...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Residentia Group







Rexel






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Residentia Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Wholesale Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Rexel in 2026.
Incident History - Residentia Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Residentia Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Rexel (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Rexel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Residentia Group

Rexel
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.