Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ResearcherResearcher
VS
SAPSAP
Researcher

Researcher

Translation and Innovation Hub, 80 Wood Lane, London, Greater London, W12 0BZ, GB

Last Update: 07/02/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Researcher’s mission is to become the world’s leading research discovery platform – giving scientists and researchers the easiest way to stay up to date the content they need to advance their work, and giving the businesses that need to reach those researchers the most ...

NAICS:511
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:156
Subsidiaries:47
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SAP

SAP

Dietmar-Hopp-Allee 16, Walldorf, 69190, DE

Last Update: 28/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.sap.com
728/1000Moderate

SAP is the leading enterprise application and business AI company. We stand at the intersection of business and technology, where our innovations are designed to directly address real business challenges and produce real-world impacts. Our solutions are the backbone fo...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:138,981
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Researcher

Researcher

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SAP

SAP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Researcher in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

SAP has 88.68% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Researcher (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Researcher cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SAP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Researcher

Researcher

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SAP

SAP

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SAP1780352800
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CHESAPSEC1777508710
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SAPJAG1773959105

FAQ

Between Researcher company and SAP company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Researcher company and SAP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Researcher company and SAP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Researcher company and SAP company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Researcher company and SAP company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Researcher company and SAP company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Researcher company and SAP company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Researcher company and SAP company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Researcher company and SAP company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Researcher company and SAP company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Researcher company and SAP company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Researcher and SAP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Researcher and SAP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Researcher or SAP ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Researcher or SAP ?
Between Researcher and SAP, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Researcher and SAP, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2