Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Utrecht Life SciencesUtrecht Life Sciences
VS
University of AmsterdamUniversity of Amsterdam
Utrecht Life Sciences

Utrecht Life Sciences

Heidelberglaan 13, Utrecht, 3584 CS, NL

Last Update: 22/03/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Life Sciences research in Utrecht is diverse. We drive innovations in human and veterinary health care, with careful consideration of our environment. Our research is interdisciplinary by nature and combines fundamental, clinical, translational and applied research from...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of Amsterdam

University of Amsterdam

Spui 21, Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1012 WX, NL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.uva.nl
781/1000Fair

The University of Amsterdam is one of the largest comprehensive universities in Europe. With some 44,000 students, 6,000 staff, 3,000 PhD candidates, and an annual budget of more than 850 million euros, it is also one of Amsterdam’s biggest employers. There is an inse...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:11,154
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Utrecht Life Sciences

Utrecht Life Sciences

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Amsterdam

University of Amsterdam

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Utrecht Life Sciences in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Amsterdam in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Utrecht Life Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Utrecht Life Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Amsterdam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Amsterdam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Utrecht Life Sciences

Utrecht Life Sciences

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of Amsterdam

University of Amsterdam

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Utrecht Life Sciences company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Utrecht Life Sciences company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Utrecht Life Sciences company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Utrecht Life Sciences company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Utrecht Life Sciences company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Utrecht Life Sciences company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Utrecht Life Sciences company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Utrecht Life Sciences company and University of Amsterdam company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Utrecht Life Sciences company and University of Amsterdam company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Utrecht Life Sciences company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Utrecht Life Sciences company and University of Amsterdam company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Utrecht Life Sciences and University of Amsterdam, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Utrecht Life Sciences and University of Amsterdam, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Utrecht Life Sciences or University of Amsterdam ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Utrecht Life Sciences or University of Amsterdam ?
Between Utrecht Life Sciences and University of Amsterdam, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Utrecht Life Sciences and University of Amsterdam, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1