Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

株式会社リクリエ株式会社リクリエ
VS
Marriott InternationalMarriott International
株式会社リクリエ

株式会社リクリエ

福岡市博多駅前4-3-22, 博多駅前4−3−22−8F, 812-0011, JP

Last Update: 17/05/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://reqrea.co.jp/
678/1000Weak

リクリエ自社ホテルブランド「グランドベース」を西日本エリアをメインに60施設展開しております。省人化ホテル運用事業とSaaS事業の2軸でホテルのアップデートを目指し、さらには運用だけでなく企画開発事業によって土地の利活用課題を解決することに挑戦しております。

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:8
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Marriott International

Marriott International

7750 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, 20814, US

Last Update: 04/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.marriott.com
711/1000Moderate

Marriott International, Inc. is based in Bethesda, Maryland, USA, and encompasses a portfolio of approximately 10,000 properties across more than 30 leading brands in 146 countries and territories. Its heritage can be traced to a root beer stand opened in Washington, D...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:243,777
Subsidiaries:36
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
株式会社リクリエ

株式会社リクリエ

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marriott International

Marriott International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

株式会社リクリエ has 37.5% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

Marriott International has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - 株式会社リクリエ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

株式会社リクリエ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marriott International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marriott International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
株式会社リクリエ

株式会社リクリエ

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
REQ1778992020
Marriott International

Marriott International

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHEGAS1776335039
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAR0802208101125
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAR13023722

FAQ

Between 株式会社リクリエ company and Marriott International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 株式会社リクリエ company and Marriott International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 株式会社リクリエ company and Marriott International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 株式会社リクリエ company and Marriott International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 株式会社リクリエ company and Marriott International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 株式会社リクリエ company and Marriott International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 株式会社リクリエ company and Marriott International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 株式会社リクリエ company and Marriott International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 株式会社リクリエ company and Marriott International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 株式会社リクリエ company and Marriott International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 株式会社リクリエ company and Marriott International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 株式会社リクリエ and Marriott International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 株式会社リクリエ and Marriott International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 株式会社リクリエ or Marriott International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 株式会社リクリエ or Marriott International ?
Between 株式会社リクリエ and Marriott International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 株式会社リクリエ and Marriott International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8