Comparison Overview
Reputation Defender by Norton
Reputation Defender by Norton
Tempe, US
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Reputation Defender is the leader in the online reputation management and digital privacy space. Founded in 2006, we pioneered the industry—and we remain the largest, most trusted company within it. Part of Gen Digital Inc., a global leader in consumer Cyber Safety wi...
Great Clips Inc.
4400 W. 78th St., Minneapolis, 55435, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Established in Minneapolis in 1982, Great Clips has grown to be the world's largest and fastest growing salon brand. There are more than 4,400 salons throughout the United States and Canada -- all of them owned by franchisees. Visit us at www.greatclips.com Employment ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Reputation Defender by Norton
Great Clips Inc.
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Reputation Defender by Norton in 2026.
Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Great Clips Inc. in 2026.
Incident History - Reputation Defender by Norton (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Reputation Defender by Norton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Great Clips Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Great Clips Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Reputation Defender by Norton
Great Clips Inc.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A flaw has been found in Comfast CF-WR631AX V3 up to 2.7.0.8. This issue affects the function system of the file /cgi-bin/mbox-config?section=ping_config of the component API Endpoint. This manipulation of the argument destination causes os command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A vulnerability was detected in activepieces up to 0.83.0. This vulnerability affects the function handleUrlFile in the library packages/server/engine/src/lib/variables/processors/file.ts of the component File URL Handler. The manipulation results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A security vulnerability has been detected in Radware Cyber Controller up to 10.11.0. This affects an unknown part of the component HTML Report Generation. The manipulation leads to HTML injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A weakness has been identified in kortix-ai suna up to 0.8.38. Affected by this issue is the function router.replace/router.push of the file apps/frontend/src/app/auth/page.tsx of the component Auth Endpoint. Executing a manipulation of the argument returnURL can lead to cross site scripting. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Upgrading to version 0.8.39 can resolve this issue. This patch is called f5dec7aa0c1b8fa0125938f292c0f2430ca75f6c. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The researcher explains: "The issue was fixed in v0.8.39 without notifying the wider user base via a security disclosure."
- https://gist.github.com/TrebledJ/fe7241910ac0aaeff86243fc88e9ffed
- https://github.com/kortix-ai/suna/
- https://github.com/kortix-ai/suna/commit/f5dec7aa0c1b8fa0125938f292c0f2430ca75f6c
- https://github.com/kortix-ai/suna/releases/tag/v0.8.39
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-12811
- https://vuldb.com/submit/837175
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/372605
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/372605/cti
A security flaw has been discovered in Edimax BR-6478AC V2 1.23. Affected by this vulnerability is the function mp of the file /goform/mp of the component POST Request Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument command results in command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.