Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

repsolrepsol
VS
PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.
repsol

repsol

Méndez Álvaro, 44, Madrid, Madrid, ES, 28045

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.repsol.com
795/1000Fair

What do you do with the energy that drives you every day? We strive to turn it into something useful for you—your decisions and your next steps. We are a company that explores multi-energy solutions through innovation, technology, and the curiosity of our team. With ove...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:25,536
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

Avenida. Libertador con calle El Empalme , Caracas, 1050, VE

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.pdvsa.com
645/1000Poor

Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. is a Venezuelan state company, began operations on January 1st, 1976 and whose activities are the oil exploration, production, refining, marketing and transportation of Venezuelan oil as well as the orimulsion, chemical, petrochemical busines...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:25,708
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
repsol

repsol

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for repsol in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - repsol (X = Date, Y = Severity)

repsol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
repsol

repsol

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PET1776853705
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PET1768583981
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
PET1765893364

FAQ

Between repsol company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between repsol company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between repsol company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between repsol company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between repsol company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between repsol company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between repsol company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between repsol company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between repsol company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between repsol company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between repsol company and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between repsol and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between repsol and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - repsol or PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - repsol or PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. ?
Between repsol and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between repsol and PDVSA Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-19374
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in adafap api-mcp up to 92b9a5d04acfec165c7d4ef852496593aa87be06. This affects the function customAxios of the file app/api/proxy/route.ts of the component Proxy API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19373
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in PhialsBasement KoboldCPP-MCP-Server 1.0.0. Affected by this issue is the function makeRequest of the file src/index.ts of the component BaseConfigSchema. Executing a manipulation of the argument apiUrl can lead to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-19372
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in Handwriting-OCR handwriting-ocr-mcp-server 0.1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function fs.readFileSync of the file src/index.ts of the component upload_document. Performing a manipulation of the argument File results in path traversal. Attacking locally is a requirement. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-19371
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in Nikolaibibo claude-comfyui-mcp 1.0.0. Affected is the function copyFileSync of the file src/tools/utils.ts of the component comfy_upload_image. Such manipulation of the argument image_path leads to path traversal. An attack has to be approached locally. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-12372
SUMMARY

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The `nltk.pathsec.validate_network_url()` function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space (`100.64.0.0/10`). This occurs because Python's `ipaddress` module does not classify such addresses as `is_private` or `is_global`, and the current guard only checks `is_private` and a few explicit categories. An attacker who can influence a URL passed to NLTK's network-loading helpers can exploit this vulnerability to make a strict-mode application send requests to shared-address-space hosts, potentially exposing non-public infrastructure reachable from the application host. The impact is limited to SSRF-style confidentiality exposure, with no code execution claimed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2