Comparison Overview
repsol

repsol
Méndez Álvaro, 44, Madrid, Madrid, ES, 28045
Last Update: 06/09/2026
What do you do with the energy that drives you every day? We strive to turn it into something useful for you—your decisions and your next steps. We are a company that explores multi-energy solutions through innovation, technology, and the curiosity of our team. With ove...

PT Pertamina (Persero)
Jl. Medan Merdeka Timur No. 11-13, Jakarta Pusat, 10110, ID
Last Update: 08/09/2026
PT Pertamina (Persero) is an Indonesian state-owned enterprise, which is engaged in the integrated energy in Indonesia. Established on December 10, 1957, Pertamina had the experiences in upstream, midstream, downstream and renewable energy sectors for more than 50 years...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

repsol







PT Pertamina (Persero)






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for repsol in 2026.
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for PT Pertamina (Persero) in 2026.
Incident History - repsol (X = Date, Y = Severity)
repsol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - PT Pertamina (Persero) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PT Pertamina (Persero) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

repsol

PT Pertamina (Persero)
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.