Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Représentations du Québec en ChineReprésentations du Québec en Chine
VS
US Government Accountability OfficeUS Government Accountability Office
Représentations du Québec en Chine

Représentations du Québec en Chine

19, Dongzhimenwai Dajie, Beijing, 100600, CN

Last Update: 03/01/2026

View Profile
757/1000Fair

Les représentations du Québec en Chine exercent un mandat général de promotion du Québec et de coordination des relations institutionnelles, économiques, scientifiques, technologiques, éducatives et culturelles. On compte dans ce réseau : - Bureau du Québec à Beijing -...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:10
Subsidiaries:42
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

441 G Street, N.W., Washington, 20548, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.gao.gov
682/1000Weak

For more information about GAO, please visit www.gao.gov. General Information The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is an independent, nonpartisan agency that works for Congress. Often called the "congressional watchdog,"​ GAO investigates how the federal go...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,303
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Représentations du Québec en Chine

Représentations du Québec en Chine

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Représentations du Québec en Chine in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

US Government Accountability Office has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Représentations du Québec en Chine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Représentations du Québec en Chine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - US Government Accountability Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Government Accountability Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Représentations du Québec en Chine

Représentations du Québec en Chine

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
US-1773483893
🔒 Incident : Breach
US-FOR1772821514

FAQ

Between Représentations du Québec en Chine company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Représentations du Québec en Chine company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Représentations du Québec en Chine company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Représentations du Québec en Chine company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Représentations du Québec en Chine company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Représentations du Québec en Chine company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Représentations du Québec en Chine company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Représentations du Québec en Chine company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Représentations du Québec en Chine company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Représentations du Québec en Chine company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Représentations du Québec en Chine company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Représentations du Québec en Chine and US Government Accountability Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Représentations du Québec en Chine and US Government Accountability Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Représentations du Québec en Chine or US Government Accountability Office ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Représentations du Québec en Chine or US Government Accountability Office ?
Between Représentations du Québec en Chine and US Government Accountability Office, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Représentations du Québec en Chine and US Government Accountability Office, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1