Comparison Overview

Rentokil Terminix

VS

Australia Post

Rentokil Terminix

None
Last Update: 2025-11-22

The Rentokil and Terminix family of brands have come together to form the world’s leading pest control company. With our shared vision, we’ll be expanding our products, services, and technology. And with our combined resources, we’ll do more to power innovation and develop sustainable solutions for our planet. It’s all part of our commitment to putting you first and delivering the highest level of comfort and peace of mind to families, businesses and local communities around the corner and around the globe. This page is intended for corporate updates. To see brand specific content, visit our affiliated pages.

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 12,593
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Australia Post

111 Bourke St, Melbourne, Victoria, AU, 3000
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Connecting businesses with consumers is the heart of commercial prosperity and the cornerstone of Australia Post's commitment to Australian businesses. As connectivity transforms our lives, Australia Post is evolving to meet the future needs of businesses by providing trusted service solutions in etailing, retailing, communications, financial services and postal. Continuous improvement of these services is our relentless objective. On LinkedIn, Australia Post only collects, uses and stores your personal information that relates to providing information in response to your queries. Without this information, Australia Post will be unable to look into your query. Your personal information may also be disclosed to third party service providers to facilitate this process. Your personal information is managed in accordance with Australia Post’s Privacy Policy. This sets out how you may seek access to and correction of your personal information and how to make complaints. A copy is available at auspost.com.au/privacy. Australia Post may only disclose the information provided by you if required or authorised by law, or in accordance with our Privacy Policy. Please refer to the Privacy Policy or contact the Privacy Contact Officer, Australia Post, GPO Box 1777, Melbourne, Vic 3000 for any privacy related queries.

NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 16,206
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rentokilterminix.jpeg
Rentokil Terminix
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australia-post.jpeg
Australia Post
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Rentokil Terminix
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Australia Post
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rentokil Terminix in 2025.

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australia Post in 2025.

Incident History — Rentokil Terminix (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rentokil Terminix cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Australia Post (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australia Post cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rentokilterminix.jpeg
Rentokil Terminix
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australia-post.jpeg
Australia Post
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Australia Post company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rentokil Terminix company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Rentokil Terminix company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Australia Post company has not reported any.

In the current year, Australia Post company and Rentokil Terminix company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Australia Post company nor Rentokil Terminix company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Rentokil Terminix company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Australia Post company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Australia Post company nor Rentokil Terminix company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Rentokil Terminix company nor Australia Post company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Rentokil Terminix nor Australia Post holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Rentokil Terminix company nor Australia Post company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Australia Post company employs more people globally than Rentokil Terminix company, reflecting its scale as a Consumer Services.

Neither Rentokil Terminix nor Australia Post holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Rentokil Terminix nor Australia Post holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Rentokil Terminix nor Australia Post holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Rentokil Terminix nor Australia Post holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Rentokil Terminix nor Australia Post holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Rentokil Terminix nor Australia Post holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H