Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Rentokil Pest Control North AmericaRentokil Pest Control North America
VS
Care.comCare.com
Rentokil Pest Control North America

Rentokil Pest Control North America

1125 Berkshire Blvd., Reading, PA, 19610, US

Last Update: 24/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://linktr.ee/rentokil
779/1000Fair

For more than 90 years, Rentokil has served as global experts in pest control. Through an integrated pest management approach, the Rentokil network of experts offer a superior level of protection and trusted solutions, pushing the boundaries of innovation and harnessing...

NAICS:81
NAICS Definition:Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees:1,441
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Care.com

Care.com

2801 N Central Expy, 11th Floor, Dallas, Texas, US, 75204

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.care.com
794/1000Fair

Care.com is where families go to find care and where caregivers go to find meaningful work. Since 2007, over 45 million people have turned to Care.com—across child care, senior care, adult care, pet care and housekeeping. We’re here to make care simpler, smarter and mor...

NAICS:81
NAICS Definition:Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees:12,479
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Rentokil Pest Control North America

Rentokil Pest Control North America

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Care.com

Care.com

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rentokil Pest Control North America in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Care.com in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Rentokil Pest Control North America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rentokil Pest Control North America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Care.com (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Care.com cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Rentokil Pest Control North America

Rentokil Pest Control North America

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Care.com

Care.com

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Rentokil Pest Control North America company and Care.com company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Rentokil Pest Control North America company and Care.com company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Rentokil Pest Control North America company and Care.com company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Rentokil Pest Control North America company and Care.com company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Rentokil Pest Control North America company and Care.com company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Rentokil Pest Control North America company and Care.com company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Rentokil Pest Control North America company and Care.com company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Rentokil Pest Control North America company and Care.com company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Rentokil Pest Control North America company and Care.com company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Rentokil Pest Control North America company and Care.com company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Rentokil Pest Control North America company and Care.com company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Rentokil Pest Control North America and Care.com, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Rentokil Pest Control North America and Care.com, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Rentokil Pest Control North America or Care.com ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Rentokil Pest Control North America or Care.com ?
Between Rentokil Pest Control North America and Care.com, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Rentokil Pest Control North America and Care.com, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA