Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

REMEA PLREMEA PL
VS
Grupo TragsaGrupo Tragsa
REMEA PL

REMEA PL

Bonifraterska, Warsaw, Mazowieckie, 00-203, PL

Last Update: 04/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.remea.pl
750/1000Fair

Jako profesjonalny i odpowiedzialny partner biznesowy, zapewniamy Klientom remediacje terenów zanieczyszczonych i zdegradowanych, włącznie z wykonaniem badania środowiskowych pod względem występowania zanieczyszczeń chemicznych w gruncie, wodzie podziemnej oraz powietrz...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:38
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grupo Tragsa

Grupo Tragsa

C/ Maldonado 58, Madrid, ES, 28006

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tragsa.es
773/1000Fair

Tragsa Group is a group of public companies, integrated in the State Industrial Ownership Corporation (SEPI), which has become a full service supplier and a reference company to Public Administrations. It is formed by four enterprises: Tragsa (1977) responsible for wor...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:11,674
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
REMEA PL

REMEA PL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Tragsa

Grupo Tragsa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for REMEA PL in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Tragsa in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - REMEA PL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

REMEA PL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Tragsa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Tragsa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
REMEA PL

REMEA PL

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grupo Tragsa

Grupo Tragsa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between REMEA PL company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between REMEA PL company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between REMEA PL company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between REMEA PL company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between REMEA PL company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between REMEA PL company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between REMEA PL company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between REMEA PL company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between REMEA PL company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between REMEA PL company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between REMEA PL company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between REMEA PL and Grupo Tragsa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between REMEA PL and Grupo Tragsa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - REMEA PL or Grupo Tragsa ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - REMEA PL or Grupo Tragsa ?
Between REMEA PL and Grupo Tragsa, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between REMEA PL and Grupo Tragsa, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3