Comparison Overview
Reliance Cyber

Reliance Cyber
1 Valentine Place, Waterloo, SE1 8QH, GB
Last Update: 02/04/2026
At Reliance Cyber, we believe in truly partnering with our customers. We merge our world-leading cyber security expertise and experience to enable organisations to focus on the things that they do best. Since 2003, we have worked closely with customers to understand th...

LexisNexis
230 Park Avenue, New York City, 10017, US
Last Update: 19/06/2026
LexisNexis is a leading innovator of private, secure, and authoritative Legal AI solutions that help legal and business professionals draft full documents with ease, make informed decisions faster, and deliver outstanding work and improved outcomes, all powered by trust...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Reliance Cyber







LexisNexis






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Reliance Cyber in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
LexisNexis has 88.68% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Reliance Cyber (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Reliance Cyber cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - LexisNexis (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LexisNexis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Reliance Cyber

LexisNexis
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.