Comparison Overview
Reliance Infrastructure

Reliance Infrastructure
Reliance Infrastructure | Reliance Group, Reliance Centre, Off Western Express Highway, Santa Cruz East, Mumbai, 400055, IN
Last Update: 19/07/2026
Reliance Infrastructure is amongst the largest and fastest growing companies in the infrastructure sector. We operate across a range of sectors including the entire Power Business Portfolio, Defence, Metro Rail, EPC & Roads. Reliance Infrastructure is the leading utili...

Xcel Energy
401 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
A leading energy provider, dedicated to excellence. We make energy work better for our customers, helping them thrive every day. That means always raising the bar - delivering better service and providing more reliable, resilient and sustainable energy to the eight stat...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Reliance Infrastructure







Xcel Energy






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
Reliance Infrastructure has 39.39% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Xcel Energy in 2026.
Incident History - Reliance Infrastructure (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Reliance Infrastructure cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Xcel Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Xcel Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Reliance Infrastructure

Xcel Energy
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.