Comparison Overview

Reliance Communications

VS

Telcel

Reliance Communications

A Block, 2nd Floor, Reliance Communications Limited, DAKC, Kopar Khairane, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400710
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.rcom.co.in

Reliance Communications Limited, founded by the late Shri Dhirubhai H Ambani (1932-2002), has Corporate clientele that includes 40,000 Indian and multinational corporations, including small and medium enterprises. Reliance Communications has established a pan-India, Next-Generation, digital network that is capable of supporting best-of-class services spanning the entire communications value chain. Reliance Communications owns and operates the world's largest Next-Generation IP-enabled connectivity infrastructure, comprising fiber optic cable systems in India, the USA, Europe, Middle East and the Asia Pacific region.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 18,273
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Telcel

Lago Zurich, Granada, Distrito Federal, 11520, MX
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.telcel.com

Telcel (Radiomóvil Dipsa) es subsidiaria de América Móvil, uno de los mayores proveedores de comunicaciones celulares de Latinoamérica, grupo líder con inversiones en telecomunicaciones en varios países del continente americano. Telcel es la empresa de telefonía celular líder en México. Nuestra solidez y estructura nos consolidan gracias a la especialización y actualización permanente de todas las personas que trabajamos en ella. Todos nosotros estamos comprometidos a satisfacer de manera eficaz y constante todas las necesidades de comunicación inalámbrica de nuestros clientes.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 15,551
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliance-communications.jpeg
Reliance Communications
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telcel.jpeg
Telcel
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Reliance Communications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Telcel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reliance Communications in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telcel in 2025.

Incident History — Reliance Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reliance Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Telcel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telcel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/reliance-communications.jpeg
Reliance Communications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telcel.jpeg
Telcel
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Telcel company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Reliance Communications company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Telcel company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Reliance Communications company.

In the current year, Telcel company and Reliance Communications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Telcel company nor Reliance Communications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Telcel company nor Reliance Communications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Telcel company nor Reliance Communications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Reliance Communications company nor Telcel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Reliance Communications nor Telcel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Reliance Communications company nor Telcel company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Reliance Communications company employs more people globally than Telcel company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Reliance Communications nor Telcel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Reliance Communications nor Telcel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Reliance Communications nor Telcel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Reliance Communications nor Telcel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Reliance Communications nor Telcel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Reliance Communications nor Telcel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References