Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Regionshospitalet GødstrupRegionshospitalet Gødstrup
VS
Fresenius GroupFresenius Group
Regionshospitalet Gødstrup

Regionshospitalet Gødstrup

Hospitalsparken 15, Herning, Middle Jutland, 7400, DK

Last Update: 25/10/2025

View Profile
765/1000Fair

Regionshospitalet Gødstrup er Region Midtjyllands hospital for de cirka 300.000 borgerne i Herning, Holstebro, Ikast-Brande, Lemvig, Ringkøbing-Skjern og Struer kommuner. Ud over Gødstrup har hospitalet klinikker i Holstebro, Lemvig, Ringkøbing og Tarm. Der er cirka...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:757
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Fresenius Group

Fresenius Group

Else-Kröner-Straße 1, Bad Homburg, 61352, DE

Last Update: 04/07/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.fresenius.com
768/1000Fair

Committed to Life - We save and improve human lives with affordable, accessible, and innovative healthcare products and the highest quality in clinical care. Fresenius is a global healthcare company headquartered in Bad Homburg v. d. Höhe, Germany. In fiscal year 2024,...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:19,612
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Regionshospitalet Gødstrup

Regionshospitalet Gødstrup

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Fresenius Group

Fresenius Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Regionshospitalet Gødstrup in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fresenius Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Regionshospitalet Gødstrup (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Regionshospitalet Gødstrup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fresenius Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fresenius Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Regionshospitalet Gødstrup

Regionshospitalet Gødstrup

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Fresenius Group

Fresenius Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
FRE1770566194
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
FRE2038291222

FAQ

Between Regionshospitalet Gødstrup company and Fresenius Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Regionshospitalet Gødstrup company and Fresenius Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Regionshospitalet Gødstrup company and Fresenius Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Regionshospitalet Gødstrup company and Fresenius Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Regionshospitalet Gødstrup company and Fresenius Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Regionshospitalet Gødstrup company and Fresenius Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Regionshospitalet Gødstrup company and Fresenius Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Regionshospitalet Gødstrup company and Fresenius Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Regionshospitalet Gødstrup company and Fresenius Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Regionshospitalet Gødstrup company and Fresenius Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Regionshospitalet Gødstrup company and Fresenius Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Regionshospitalet Gødstrup and Fresenius Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Regionshospitalet Gødstrup and Fresenius Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Regionshospitalet Gødstrup or Fresenius Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Regionshospitalet Gødstrup or Fresenius Group ?
Between Regionshospitalet Gødstrup and Fresenius Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Regionshospitalet Gødstrup and Fresenius Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8