Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Regional utveckling - Region SkåneRegional utveckling - Region Skåne
VS
Region MidtjyllandRegion Midtjylland
Regional utveckling - Region Skåne

Regional utveckling - Region Skåne

Dockplatsen 26, Malmö, 21119, SE

Last Update: 21/04/2026

View Profile
760/1000Fair

Region Skånes arbete med regional utveckling syftar till att skapa ett hållbart och konkurrenskraftigt Skåne med hög livskvalitet och stark framtidstro. Genom att utveckla strategier, sprida kunskap, finansiera insatser, samarbeta brett och påverka nationella beslut tar...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:172
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Region Midtjylland

Region Midtjylland

Skottenborg 26, Viborg, 8800, DK

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
779/1000Fair

Central Denmark Region is one of five regions in Denmark. Denmark is organised at three political and administrative levels: the national (government), the regional (5 regions) and the municipal level (98 municipalities). Each region is led by a Regional Council, co...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:14,924
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Regional utveckling - Region Skåne

Regional utveckling - Region Skåne

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Region Midtjylland

Region Midtjylland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Regional utveckling - Region Skåne in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Region Midtjylland in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Regional utveckling - Region Skåne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Regional utveckling - Region Skåne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Region Midtjylland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Region Midtjylland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Regional utveckling - Region Skåne

Regional utveckling - Region Skåne

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Region Midtjylland

Region Midtjylland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Region Midtjylland company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Region Midtjylland company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Region Midtjylland company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne and Region Midtjylland, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne and Region Midtjylland, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Regional utveckling - Region Skåne or Region Midtjylland ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Regional utveckling - Region Skåne or Region Midtjylland ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne and Region Midtjylland, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne and Region Midtjylland, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1