Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Regional utveckling - Region SkåneRegional utveckling - Region Skåne
VS
Malmö stadMalmö stad
Regional utveckling - Region Skåne

Regional utveckling - Region Skåne

Dockplatsen 26, Malmö, 21119, SE

Last Update: 21/04/2026

View Profile
760/1000Fair

Region Skånes arbete med regional utveckling syftar till att skapa ett hållbart och konkurrenskraftigt Skåne med hög livskvalitet och stark framtidstro. Genom att utveckla strategier, sprida kunskap, finansiera insatser, samarbeta brett och påverka nationella beslut tar...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:172
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Malmö stad

Malmö stad

August Palms plats 1, Malmö, 205 80, SE

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://malmo.se/jobb
779/1000Fair

Bli en samhällsbyggare – jobba i Malmö stad! Genom att arbeta i Malmö stad får du möjlighet att arbeta med hållbar samhällsutveckling. Som en samhällsbyggare spelar du en viktig roll i Malmös utveckling och därför ser vi oss som framtidens arbetsplats. Människors lik...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:14,500
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Regional utveckling - Region Skåne

Regional utveckling - Region Skåne

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Malmö stad

Malmö stad

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Regional utveckling - Region Skåne in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Malmö stad in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Regional utveckling - Region Skåne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Regional utveckling - Region Skåne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Malmö stad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Malmö stad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Regional utveckling - Region Skåne

Regional utveckling - Region Skåne

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Malmö stad

Malmö stad

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Malmö stad company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Malmö stad company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Malmö stad company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Malmö stad company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Malmö stad company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne company and Malmö stad company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne and Malmö stad, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne and Malmö stad, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Regional utveckling - Region Skåne or Malmö stad ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Regional utveckling - Region Skåne or Malmö stad ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne and Malmö stad, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Regional utveckling - Region Skåne and Malmö stad, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA