Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Regence BlueShieldRegence BlueShield
VS
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue ShieldAnthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield
Regence BlueShield

Regence BlueShield

1501 Market St, Tacoma, 98402, US

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://regence.com/
676/1000Weak

Regence BlueShield has been a symbol of stability in local communities for 100 years, connecting people and their families to health care when and where they need it most. Powered by the national strength and security of Blue Cross and Blue Shield, we strive to give yo...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:385
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield

120 Monument Circle, Indianapolis, 46204, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.anthem.com/
653/1000Weak

At Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield we understand our health connects us to each other. What we all do impacts those around us. So Anthem is dedicated to delivering better care to our members, providing greater value to our customers and helping improve the health of o...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:10,469
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Regence BlueShield

Regence BlueShield

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Regence BlueShield in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Regence BlueShield (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Regence BlueShield cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Regence BlueShield

Regence BlueShield

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
REG42271123
🔒 Incident : Breach
REG358072625
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ANT0192801112125
🔒 Incident : Breach
ANT451072525
🔒 Incident : Breach
ANT032090625

FAQ

Between Regence BlueShield company and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Regence BlueShield company and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Regence BlueShield company and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Regence BlueShield company and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Regence BlueShield company and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Regence BlueShield company and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Regence BlueShield company and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Regence BlueShield company and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Regence BlueShield company and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Regence BlueShield company and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Regence BlueShield company and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Regence BlueShield and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Regence BlueShield and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Regence BlueShield or Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Regence BlueShield or Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield ?
Between Regence BlueShield and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Regence BlueShield and Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2