Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Regence BlueCross BlueShield of OregonRegence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon
VS
GNP SegurosGNP Seguros
Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon

Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon

100 SW Market St, Portland, 97201, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://regence.com/
703/1000Moderate

Regence is part of a family of regional health plans that have been a symbol of strength and stability in local communities for more than 100 years. We connect people and their families to health care when and where they need it most. Powered by the national strength a...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:1,467
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
GNP Seguros

GNP Seguros

Av. Cerro de las Torres #395 Col. Campestre Churubusco, Del. Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, 04200, MX

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gnp.com.mx
778/1000Fair

Somos la empresa aseguradora multirramo 100% mexicana de mayor experiencia y solidez de nuestro país. Por más de 116 años hemos protegido a las familias mexicanas, respaldando sus sueños, historias, emociones y vivencias. Estamos orgullosos de formar parte de uno de lo...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:13,411
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon

Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GNP Seguros

GNP Seguros

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GNP Seguros in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GNP Seguros (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GNP Seguros cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon

Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
REG41271123
GNP Seguros

GNP Seguros

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon company and GNP Seguros company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon company and GNP Seguros company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon company and GNP Seguros company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon company and GNP Seguros company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon company and GNP Seguros company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon company and GNP Seguros company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon company and GNP Seguros company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon company and GNP Seguros company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon company and GNP Seguros company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon company and GNP Seguros company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon company and GNP Seguros company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon and GNP Seguros, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon and GNP Seguros, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon or GNP Seguros ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon or GNP Seguros ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon and GNP Seguros, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon and GNP Seguros, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8