Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Regence BlueCross BlueShield of UtahRegence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah
VS
IntactIntact
Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah

Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah

2890 E Cottonwood Pkwy, Cottonwood Heights, Utah, undefined, US

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://regence.com/
751/1000Fair

Regence is part of a family of regional health plans that have been a symbol of strength and stability in local communities for 100 years, connecting people and their families to health care when and where they need it most. Powered by the national strength and securit...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:96
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Intact

Intact

700 University Avenue, Toronto, M5G 0A1, CA

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

We created a purpose-driven company based on Values and a belief that insurance is about people, not things. This is the foundation on which we have built Intact and it lives every day through our purpose, Values, what we aim to achieve and how. ___ Nous sommes là pour...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:20,853
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah

Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Intact

Intact

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intact in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Intact (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intact cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah

Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Intact

Intact

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah company and Intact company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah company and Intact company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah company and Intact company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah company and Intact company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah company and Intact company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah company and Intact company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah company and Intact company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah company and Intact company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah company and Intact company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah company and Intact company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah company and Intact company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah and Intact, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah and Intact, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah or Intact ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah or Intact ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah and Intact, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Utah and Intact, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2