Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Regal Securities, Inc.Regal Securities, Inc.
VS
MUFGMUFG
Regal Securities, Inc.

Regal Securities, Inc.

950 Milwaukee Ave, Glenview, 60025, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
686/1000Weak

In the race to sameness, the financial services industry is attempting to fit advisors and their clients into an increasingly limited set of solutions. Conversely, Regal does not subscribe to a one size fits all approach as each advisor’s business, and their client’s f...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:73
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
MUFG

MUFG

2-7-1, Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, 100-8330, JP

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
836/1000Good

MUFG (Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group) is one of the world's leading financial groups. Headquartered in Tokyo and with over 360 years of history, MUFG has a global network with over 2,100 locations in more than 40 markets including the Americas, Europe, the Middle East a...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:22,578
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Regal Securities, Inc.

Regal Securities, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MUFG

MUFG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Regal Securities, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MUFG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Regal Securities, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Regal Securities, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MUFG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MUFG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Regal Securities, Inc.

Regal Securities, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
REG922072525
🔒 Incident : Breach
REG559072525
MUFG

MUFG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Regal Securities, Inc. company and MUFG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Regal Securities, Inc. company and MUFG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Regal Securities, Inc. company and MUFG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Regal Securities, Inc. company and MUFG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Regal Securities, Inc. company and MUFG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Regal Securities, Inc. company and MUFG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Regal Securities, Inc. company and MUFG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Regal Securities, Inc. company and MUFG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Regal Securities, Inc. company and MUFG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Regal Securities, Inc. company and MUFG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Regal Securities, Inc. company and MUFG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Regal Securities, Inc. and MUFG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Regal Securities, Inc. and MUFG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Regal Securities, Inc. or MUFG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Regal Securities, Inc. or MUFG ?
Between Regal Securities, Inc. and MUFG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Regal Securities, Inc. and MUFG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3