Comparison Overview

Refund Management Services

VS

Resorts World Las Vegas

Refund Management Services

5255 Yonge Street, Toronto, ON, M2N6P4, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.refundmanagement.com

Refund Management Services specializes in repatriating withheld US gaming tax. We’ve helped thousands of Canadian gamblers (and gamblers from other countries around the world who qualify) to claim back their IRS-imposed tax from winnings across many gaming platforms. We are well-versed in the current and proposed gaming laws and the tax laws in the USA, and, within the perimeters laid down by federal and state laws, we ensure that any tax inappropriately withheld is returned to you. RMS was established in 1998. Since then, thousands of Canadians have benefited financially from contacting us as soon as they returned to Canada to initiate the claim. We’ve built a solid reputation as the most successful tax recoverer in the industry. RMS is based in Toronto, Ontario, with additional offices in Vancouver, British Columbia and Las Vegas, Nevada.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Resorts World Las Vegas

3000 Las Vegas Blvd S, Las Vegas, Nevada, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rwlasvegas.com

Resorts World Las Vegas was developed by Genting Berhad, a publicly traded Malaysian corporation registered with the Nevada Gaming Commission. The company has affiliated operations in the Americas, Malaysia, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the Bahamas. In partnership with Hilton, Resorts World Las Vegas integrates three of Hilton’s premium brands into its resort campus, including Las Vegas Hilton, the resort’s full-service brand; Conrad Las Vegas, Hilton’s lifestyle luxury brand; and LXR, Hilton’s network of independent luxury properties, which operates as Crockfords Las Vegas, Genting’s internationally renowned ultra-luxury brand. Resorts World Las Vegas features 3,506 guest rooms and suites, an innovative, next-generation gaming floor, world-class food and beverage options, a 5,000-capacity theatre, distinct nightlife venues, a curated retail collection of designer and boutique shops and more. The integrated resort weaves time-honored traditions of the international Resorts World brand into the fabric of Las Vegas, introducing a bold, fresh take on hospitality to the city with stunning design, progressive technology and world-class guest service. Resorts World Las Vegas is Sharecare Health Security VERIFIED™ with Forbes Travel Guide, a verification that ensures the resort has appropriate health safety procedures in place. For more information, visit rwlasvegas.com or find us on Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter and Instagram.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 1,479
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/refund-management-services.jpeg
Refund Management Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resortsworldlv.jpeg
Resorts World Las Vegas
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Refund Management Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Resorts World Las Vegas
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Refund Management Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Resorts World Las Vegas in 2025.

Incident History — Refund Management Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Refund Management Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Resorts World Las Vegas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Resorts World Las Vegas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/refund-management-services.jpeg
Refund Management Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/resortsworldlv.jpeg
Resorts World Las Vegas
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Resorts World Las Vegas company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Refund Management Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Resorts World Las Vegas company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Refund Management Services company.

In the current year, Resorts World Las Vegas company and Refund Management Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Resorts World Las Vegas company nor Refund Management Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Resorts World Las Vegas company nor Refund Management Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Resorts World Las Vegas company nor Refund Management Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Refund Management Services company nor Resorts World Las Vegas company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Refund Management Services nor Resorts World Las Vegas holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Refund Management Services company nor Resorts World Las Vegas company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Resorts World Las Vegas company employs more people globally than Refund Management Services company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Refund Management Services nor Resorts World Las Vegas holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Refund Management Services nor Resorts World Las Vegas holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Refund Management Services nor Resorts World Las Vegas holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Refund Management Services nor Resorts World Las Vegas holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Refund Management Services nor Resorts World Las Vegas holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Refund Management Services nor Resorts World Las Vegas holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References