Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

redONE Mobile MYredONE Mobile MY
VS
NokiaNokia
redONE Mobile MY

redONE Mobile MY

A-3-42, IOI Boulevard, Jalan Kenari 5, Bandar Puchong Jaya, Puchong, Selangor, MY, 47170

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
704/1000Moderate

Established in 2012, redone Mobile is the first Mobile Virtual Network Operator (MVNO) in Malaysia to provide affordable prepaid and postpaid services and is known for its 5G plans starting from as low as RM10 monthly. Riding on the widest 5G network infrastructure of t...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:376
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Nokia

Nokia

Karakaari 7, Espoo, 02610, FI

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.nokia.com
808/1000Good

Nokia is a global leader in connectivity for the AI era. With expertise across fixed, mobile, and transport networks, powered by the innovation of Nokia Bell Labs, we’re advancing connectivity to secure a brighter world. Advanced connectivity is key to enable the oppor...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:100,518
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
redONE Mobile MY

redONE Mobile MY

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nokia

Nokia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for redONE Mobile MY in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nokia in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - redONE Mobile MY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

redONE Mobile MY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nokia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nokia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
redONE Mobile MY

redONE Mobile MY

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
RED2217101122
Nokia

Nokia

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
NOK000031025

FAQ

Between redONE Mobile MY company and Nokia company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between redONE Mobile MY company and Nokia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between redONE Mobile MY company and Nokia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between redONE Mobile MY company and Nokia company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between redONE Mobile MY company and Nokia company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between redONE Mobile MY company and Nokia company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between redONE Mobile MY company and Nokia company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between redONE Mobile MY company and Nokia company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between redONE Mobile MY company and Nokia company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between redONE Mobile MY company and Nokia company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between redONE Mobile MY company and Nokia company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between redONE Mobile MY and Nokia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between redONE Mobile MY and Nokia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - redONE Mobile MY or Nokia ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - redONE Mobile MY or Nokia ?
Between redONE Mobile MY and Nokia, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between redONE Mobile MY and Nokia, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3