Comparison Overview
Red Bee Media Nederland

Red Bee Media Nederland
Koos Postemalaan 2, Hilversum, 1217 ZC, NL
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Elke dag kijken mensen op alle continenten naar televisieprogramma’s voorbereid, beheerd en uitgezonden door Red Bee Media. Jaarlijks levert het bedrijf meer dan 2,7 miljoen uren aan programmering in meer dan 60 talen, voor bijna 600 tv-zenders wereldwijd. Als eigenaar...

Freelancer
N/A
Last Update: 31/03/2026
A freelancer or freelance worker is a term commonly used for a person who is self-employed and is not necessarily committed to a particular employer long-term. Freelance workers are sometimes represented by a company or a temporary agency that resells freelance labor to...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Red Bee Media Nederland







Freelancer






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Media Production Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Red Bee Media Nederland in 2026.
Incidents vs Media Production Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Freelancer in 2026.
Incident History - Red Bee Media Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Red Bee Media Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Freelancer (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Freelancer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Red Bee Media Nederland

Freelancer
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.