Comparison Overview

Recycle Coach

VS

Clean Harbors

Recycle Coach

Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 700 and 749

Recycle Coach is recycling simplified. We save people time and energy with intuitive digital tools that make recycling easy. Our goal is to be in every city, on every device, empowering communities to waste less and recycle more.

NAICS: 54162
NAICS Definition: Environmental Consulting Services
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 65
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Clean Harbors

42 Longwater Drive, P.O. Box 9149, Norwell, MA, US, 02061-9149
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799

Clean Harbors is North America’s leading provider of environmental and industrial services. The Company serves a diverse customer base, including a majority of Fortune 500 companies. Its customer base spans a number of industries, including chemical, and manufacturing, as well as numerous government agencies. These customers rely on Clean Harbors to deliver a broad range of services such as end-to-end hazardous waste management, emergency spill response, industrial cleaning and maintenance, and recycling services. Through its Safety-Kleen subsidiary, Clean Harbors also is North America’s largest re-refiner and recycler of used oil and a leading provider of parts washers and environmental services to commercial, industrial and automotive customers. Founded in 1980 and based in Massachusetts, Clean Harbors operates throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico and Puerto Rico.

NAICS: 54162
NAICS Definition: Environmental Consulting Services
Employees: 12,592
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/recyclecoach.jpeg
Recycle Coach
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clean-harbors.jpeg
Clean Harbors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Recycle Coach
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Clean Harbors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Recycle Coach in 2025.

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clean Harbors in 2025.

Incident History — Recycle Coach (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Recycle Coach cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Clean Harbors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clean Harbors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/recyclecoach.jpeg
Recycle Coach
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clean-harbors.jpeg
Clean Harbors
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External Hacking
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Clean Harbors company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Recycle Coach company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Recycle Coach and Clean Harbors have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Clean Harbors company and Recycle Coach company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Clean Harbors company nor Recycle Coach company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Clean Harbors company and Recycle Coach company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Clean Harbors company nor Recycle Coach company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Recycle Coach company nor Clean Harbors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Recycle Coach nor Clean Harbors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Recycle Coach company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Clean Harbors company.

Clean Harbors company employs more people globally than Recycle Coach company, reflecting its scale as a Environmental Services.

Neither Recycle Coach nor Clean Harbors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Recycle Coach nor Clean Harbors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Recycle Coach nor Clean Harbors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Recycle Coach nor Clean Harbors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Recycle Coach nor Clean Harbors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Recycle Coach nor Clean Harbors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H