Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Recycling at WorkRecycling at Work
VS
WMWM
Recycling at Work

Recycling at Work

Toronto, M4M 3L1, CA

Last Update: 25/11/2025

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Its time to make the future of our planet Part of your company’s mission Start today and be part of the solution We save businesses time and energy with intuitive digital tools that make recycling easy. Our goal is to be in every business, on every device, empowering co...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:65
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
WM

WM

800 Capitol St, Suite 3000, Houston, Texas, US, 77002

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.wm.com
820/1000Good

WM is North America's leading provider of integrated environmental solutions. We partner with our customers and communities to manage and reduce waste from collection to disposal while recovering valuable resources and creating clean, renewable energy. We are on a quest...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:27,214
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Recycling at Work

Recycling at Work

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
WM

WM

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Recycling at Work in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WM in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Recycling at Work (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Recycling at Work cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - WM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Recycling at Work

Recycling at Work

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
WM

WM

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Recycling at Work company and WM company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Recycling at Work company and WM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Recycling at Work company and WM company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Recycling at Work company and WM company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Recycling at Work company and WM company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Recycling at Work company and WM company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Recycling at Work company and WM company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Recycling at Work company and WM company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Recycling at Work company and WM company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Recycling at Work company and WM company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Recycling at Work company and WM company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Recycling at Work and WM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Recycling at Work and WM, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Recycling at Work or WM ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Recycling at Work or WM ?
Between Recycling at Work and WM, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Recycling at Work and WM, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-47238
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #133, a normal authenticated user can edit another user's video subtitles because of a lack of authorization. They can upload subtitles, edit their name or delete them. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #133.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-45418
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #132, any authenticated user who can upload videos can add multiple subtitles from different files and change their title (English, Spanish...). The POST /actions/subtitle_edit.php request used to change their title includes a number parameter which is vulnerable to SQL Injection. A boolean-based blind SQL injection can be used to exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #132.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45060
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #129, the actions/progress_video.php endpoint is vulnerable to blind SQL injection. Any unauthenticated user can exploit the ids parameter to execute SQL queries and exfiltrate sensitive data. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #129.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-42846
SUMMARY

ClipBucket v5 is an open source video sharing platform. Prior to version 5.5.3 - #140, ClipBucket's Remote Play feature allows any authenticated user to add a video by importing an external URL as the source. Some shell commands are run with the URL as a parameter. The URL is concatenated directly into shell commands without escaping then executed, so any shell metacharacter in the URL is interpreted. This results in arbitrary command execution. This issue has been patched in version 5.5.3 - #140.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-6250
SUMMARY

An authenticated format string vulnerability exists in the ONVIF service of Tapo C110 v2 due to improper handling of user-controlled input.  Externally controlled data is interpreted as a format string, which can be used to manipulate stack memory, including control flow data such as return addresses. A remote authenticated attacker may redirect execution flow to existing internal functions, triggering an unauthorized factory reset, leading to loss of configuration, deletion of stored credentials and service disruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-11
UPDATED
Date2026-06-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA