Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー
VS
ComputacenterComputacenter
株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー

株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー

芝浦3-12-7, 港区, 108-0023, JP

Last Update: 09/04/2026

View Profile
674/1000Weak

住まいを中心とした暮らし領域の「未来にある普通のもの」を生み出すために。 1976年の「住宅情報」創刊から始まった私たちの事業は、住まいを探しているカスタマーの方々と、多くの企業の皆様に支えられて成長してきました。そして今、住まい・暮らし領域には、ReTech(不動産テック)という大きな潮流が訪れ、ITによる業界変革が急速に進んでおり、不動産・住宅情報サイトとして国内トップクラスのカスタマーリーチを誇る「SUUMO」も、ITを駆使してイノベーションをおこし続ける必要があります。 これから5年後、10年後はどんな暮らし方、住まいの探し...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:114
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Computacenter

Computacenter

Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, GB, AL10 9TW

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.computacenter.com
759/1000Fair

Computacenter is a leading independent technology and services provider, trusted by large corporate and public sector organisations. We are a responsible business that believes in winning together for our people and our planet. We help our customers to Source, Tran...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:19,537
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー

株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Computacenter

Computacenter

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー has 46.24% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Computacenter in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー (X = Date, Y = Severity)

株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Computacenter (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Computacenter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー

株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
RECCHIATH1775708870
Computacenter

Computacenter

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
COM224219323

FAQ

Between 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー company and Computacenter company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー company and Computacenter company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー company and Computacenter company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー company and Computacenter company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー company and Computacenter company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー company and Computacenter company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー company and Computacenter company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー company and Computacenter company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー company and Computacenter company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー company and Computacenter company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー company and Computacenter company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー and Computacenter, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー and Computacenter, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー or Computacenter ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー or Computacenter ?
Between 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー and Computacenter, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 株式会社リクルート住まいカンパニー and Computacenter, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA