Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Reckitt Pro Solutions AUReckitt Pro Solutions AU
VS
LindeLinde
Reckitt Pro Solutions AU

Reckitt Pro Solutions AU

N/A

Last Update: 05/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dettol.com.au
770/1000Fair

Today, consumers need to know that businesses are doing what they can to help stop the spread of germs. Dettol Pro Solutions, helps protect your work spaces to give your customers and employees the confidence they need. The benefits of Dettol Pro Solutions: - Build con...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Linde

Linde

43 Church Street West, Woking, GU21 6HT, GB

Last Update: 01/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.linde.com
834/1000Good

Linde is a leading global industrial gases and engineering company with 2025 sales of $34 billion. We live our mission of making our world more productive every day by providing high-quality solutions, technologies and services which are making our customers more succes...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:39,733
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Reckitt Pro Solutions AU

Reckitt Pro Solutions AU

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Linde

Linde

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Reckitt Pro Solutions AU in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Linde in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Reckitt Pro Solutions AU (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Reckitt Pro Solutions AU cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Linde (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Linde cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Reckitt Pro Solutions AU

Reckitt Pro Solutions AU

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Linde

Linde

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Reckitt Pro Solutions AU company and Linde company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Reckitt Pro Solutions AU company and Linde company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Reckitt Pro Solutions AU company and Linde company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Reckitt Pro Solutions AU company and Linde company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Reckitt Pro Solutions AU company and Linde company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Reckitt Pro Solutions AU company and Linde company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Reckitt Pro Solutions AU company and Linde company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Reckitt Pro Solutions AU company and Linde company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Reckitt Pro Solutions AU company and Linde company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Reckitt Pro Solutions AU company and Linde company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Reckitt Pro Solutions AU company and Linde company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Reckitt Pro Solutions AU and Linde, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Reckitt Pro Solutions AU and Linde, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Reckitt Pro Solutions AU or Linde ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Reckitt Pro Solutions AU or Linde ?
Between Reckitt Pro Solutions AU and Linde, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Reckitt Pro Solutions AU and Linde, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA