Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Faculteit Rechten Universiteit AntwerpenFaculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen
VS
University of South CarolinaUniversity of South Carolina
Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen

Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen

Venusstraat 23, Antwerp, BE-, 2000, BE

Last Update: 03/02/2026

View Profile
769/1000Fair

De Faculteit Rechten van de Universiteit Antwerpen is een bloeiende academische gemeenschap van bijna 2.000 studenten en meer dan 340 academische en administratieve medewerkers die onderwijs verstrekken, onderzoek verrichten en publiek engagement tonen in de rechten. De...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:47
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of South Carolina

University of South Carolina

Columbia, SC, US, 29208

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://sc.edu
799/1000Fair

With thriving academic and research excellence and a lively, welcoming student experience, the University of South Carolina brings the opportunities of higher education to new generations. South Carolina's unrivaled college experience has been sought by students, facul...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:13,232
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen

Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of South Carolina

University of South Carolina

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of South Carolina in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of South Carolina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of South Carolina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen

Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of South Carolina

University of South Carolina

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and University of South Carolina company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and University of South Carolina company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and University of South Carolina company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and University of South Carolina company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and University of South Carolina company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and University of South Carolina company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen and University of South Carolina, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen and University of South Carolina, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen or University of South Carolina ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen or University of South Carolina ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen and University of South Carolina, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen and University of South Carolina, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66339
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. After a CONNECT tunnel is established through an HTTP proxy, libsoup incorrectly attaches the Proxy-Authorization header to subsequent HTTPS requests sent through that tunnel to the destination server. This allows the destination server to capture proxy credentials, leading to information disclosure.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-66338
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. The chunked transfer encoding parser uses a permissive parsing function for chunk sizes that silently accepts inputs violating RFC 9112, including leading whitespace, plus sign prefixes, and trailing invalid characters. When libsoup operates behind a strict frontend proxy, this parsing differential can be exploited to smuggle HTTP requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-66337
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libsoup. An unsigned integer underflow in the soup_filter_input_stream_read_until() function causes a heap buffer over-read when parsing multipart HTTP responses. A malicious HTTP server can exploit this by sending a crafted multipart response, potentially causing the client application to crash or disclose sensitive heap memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-61892
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI allows a non-privileged user to modify tokens to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-61886
SUMMARY

Weintek cMT3092X HMI stores user account passwords in plaintext.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-24
UPDATED
Date2026-07-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8