Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Faculteit Rechten Universiteit AntwerpenFaculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen
VS
UNSWUNSW
Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen

Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen

Venusstraat 23, Antwerp, BE-, 2000, BE

Last Update: 03/02/2026

View Profile
769/1000Fair

De Faculteit Rechten van de Universiteit Antwerpen is een bloeiende academische gemeenschap van bijna 2.000 studenten en meer dan 340 academische en administratieve medewerkers die onderwijs verstrekken, onderzoek verrichten en publiek engagement tonen in de rechten. De...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:47
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UNSW

UNSW

Gate 9, High St Kensington 2052, Sydney, New South Wales (NSW), AU, 2052

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.unsw.edu.au/
807/1000Good

The University of New South Wales (UNSW) is one of Australia's leading research and teaching universities. Established in 1949, UNSW has expanded rapidly and now has more than 52,000 students, including more than 14,000 international students from over 130 different c...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:17,425
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen

Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UNSW

UNSW

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNSW in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UNSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen

Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UNSW

UNSW

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and UNSW company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and UNSW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and UNSW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and UNSW company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and UNSW company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and UNSW company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and UNSW company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and UNSW company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and UNSW company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and UNSW company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen company and UNSW company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen and UNSW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen and UNSW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen or UNSW ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen or UNSW ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen and UNSW, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Faculteit Rechten Universiteit Antwerpen and UNSW, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8