Comparison Overview
Régie de l’énergie du Canada

Régie de l’énergie du Canada
N/A
Last Update: 28/11/2025
Nous sommes la Régie de l’énergie du Canada. Nous travaillons pour vous afin d’assurer le déplacement sûr de l’énergie partout au Canada. Nous travaillons dans l’intérêt du public. Cela signifie que nous rendons des décisions en fonction de ce qui importe à tous plutôt ...

Belastingdienst
Korte Voorhout 7, Den Haag, NL, 2500 EE
Last Update: 03/04/2026
De organisatie bestaat uit diverse onderdelen, waaronder de Belastingdienst, Douane, Toeslagen, FIOD en enkele facilitaire organisaties. Met ruim 30.000 medewerkers werken we in kantoren die verspreid zijn over het hele land. Gezamenlijk heffen, innen en controleren we ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Régie de l’énergie du Canada







Belastingdienst






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Régie de l’énergie du Canada in 2026.
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Belastingdienst in 2026.
Incident History - Régie de l’énergie du Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Régie de l’énergie du Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Belastingdienst (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Belastingdienst cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Régie de l’énergie du Canada

Belastingdienst
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.