Comparison Overview
ReActive | Digital Services
ReActive | Digital Services
N/A
Last Update: 19/04/2026
In ReActive siamo i professionisti che lavorano alla realizzazione di soluzioni software innovative, per la digital e cloud transformation degli ecosistemi finance&insurance. #DigitalExperience Per ottenere risultati d’eccellenza il nostro modello di lavoro pone la ma...
Indra
Avda. Bruselas, 35, Madrid, 28108, ES
Last Update: 01/07/2026
Indra Group (https://www.indragroup.com/) is the foremost Spanish multinational and one of the leading European companies that focus on defence and advanced technologies. It stands at the forefront of the defence, space, air traffic management, mobility, and Information...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
ReActive | Digital Services
Indra
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ReActive | Digital Services in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Indra has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - ReActive | Digital Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ReActive | Digital Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Indra (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Indra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
ReActive | Digital Services
Indra
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.