Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ReachCentrumReachCentrum
VS
Asahi KaseiAsahi Kasei
ReachCentrum

ReachCentrum

Cantersteen 47, Brussels, 1000, BE

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.reachcentrum.eu
751/1000Fair

ReachCentrum is the professional services body established originally by Cefic, the European Chemical Industry Council and since May 2015 part of ERM, the world’s leading sustainability consultancy. At ReachCentrum we provide guidance to get acquainted with the REACH re...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:32
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Asahi Kasei

Asahi Kasei

1-1-2 Yurakucho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-0006, JP

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.asahi-kasei.com
786/1000Fair

🏢 About Asahi Kasei The Asahi Kasei Group contributes to life and living for people around the world. Since its foundation in 1922 with ammonia and cellulose fiber business, Asahi Kasei has consistently grown through the proactive transformation of its business portfol...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:10,034
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ReachCentrum

ReachCentrum

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Asahi Kasei

Asahi Kasei

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ReachCentrum in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Asahi Kasei in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ReachCentrum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ReachCentrum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Asahi Kasei (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Asahi Kasei cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ReachCentrum

ReachCentrum

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Asahi Kasei

Asahi Kasei

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ReachCentrum company and Asahi Kasei company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ReachCentrum company and Asahi Kasei company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ReachCentrum company and Asahi Kasei company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ReachCentrum company and Asahi Kasei company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ReachCentrum company and Asahi Kasei company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ReachCentrum company and Asahi Kasei company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ReachCentrum company and Asahi Kasei company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ReachCentrum company and Asahi Kasei company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ReachCentrum company and Asahi Kasei company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ReachCentrum company and Asahi Kasei company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ReachCentrum company and Asahi Kasei company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ReachCentrum and Asahi Kasei, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ReachCentrum and Asahi Kasei, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ReachCentrum or Asahi Kasei ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ReachCentrum or Asahi Kasei ?
Between ReachCentrum and Asahi Kasei, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ReachCentrum and Asahi Kasei, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA