Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

RAXA Techno Security SolutionsRAXA Techno Security Solutions
VS
Gendarmerie NationaleGendarmerie Nationale
RAXA Techno Security Solutions

RAXA Techno Security Solutions

Project Office, New Udaan Bhawan, Opp. Terminal 3, IGI Airport, New Udaan Bhawan, IGI Airport, New Delhi, IN, 110037

Last Update: 03/02/2026

View Profile
762/1000Fair

Backed by one of the nation’s best infrastructure groups, RAXA was formed with an aim to deliver cost-effective and comprehensive solutions by bringing together the best of people and technology along with diverse industry and customer experience.

NAICS:5616
NAICS Definition:Investigation and Security Services
Employees:866
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Gendarmerie Nationale

Gendarmerie Nationale

4 rue Claude Bernard, Issy les Moulineaux, 92130, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
789/1000Fair

Force humaine de près de 100 000 hommes et femmes placée sous l’autorité du ministère de l’Intérieur, la Gendarmerie nationale est une institution militaire garante de la sécurité et de la paix de nos concitoyens, et de la protection de leurs biens. Elle assure des miss...

NAICS:5616
NAICS Definition:Investigation and Security Services
Employees:32,674
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
RAXA Techno Security Solutions

RAXA Techno Security Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Gendarmerie Nationale

Gendarmerie Nationale

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RAXA Techno Security Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gendarmerie Nationale in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - RAXA Techno Security Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RAXA Techno Security Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Gendarmerie Nationale (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gendarmerie Nationale cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
RAXA Techno Security Solutions

RAXA Techno Security Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Gendarmerie Nationale

Gendarmerie Nationale

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between RAXA Techno Security Solutions company and Gendarmerie Nationale company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between RAXA Techno Security Solutions company and Gendarmerie Nationale company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between RAXA Techno Security Solutions company and Gendarmerie Nationale company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between RAXA Techno Security Solutions company and Gendarmerie Nationale company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between RAXA Techno Security Solutions company and Gendarmerie Nationale company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between RAXA Techno Security Solutions company and Gendarmerie Nationale company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between RAXA Techno Security Solutions company and Gendarmerie Nationale company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between RAXA Techno Security Solutions company and Gendarmerie Nationale company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between RAXA Techno Security Solutions company and Gendarmerie Nationale company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between RAXA Techno Security Solutions company and Gendarmerie Nationale company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between RAXA Techno Security Solutions company and Gendarmerie Nationale company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between RAXA Techno Security Solutions and Gendarmerie Nationale, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between RAXA Techno Security Solutions and Gendarmerie Nationale, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - RAXA Techno Security Solutions or Gendarmerie Nationale ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - RAXA Techno Security Solutions or Gendarmerie Nationale ?
Between RAXA Techno Security Solutions and Gendarmerie Nationale, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between RAXA Techno Security Solutions and Gendarmerie Nationale, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8