Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

RATPgroupRATPgroup
VS
Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityMetropolitan Transportation Authority
RATPgroup

RATPgroup

54 Quai de la Rapée PARIS, 75012, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://ratpgroup.com
772/1000Fair

The RATP Group is the world's third largest public transport company, carrying 12 million people every day in France and around the world. It boasts unrivalled experience in design, project management, operation and maintenance of all types of urban and suburban transpo...

NAICS:4851
NAICS Definition:Urban Transit Systems
Employees:10,001
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Metropolitan Transportation Authority

2 Broadway, New York, 10004, US

Last Update: 27/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https:/mta.info/
776/1000Fair

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority is North America's largest transportation network, serving a population of 15.3 million people in the 5,000-square-mile area fanning out from New York City through Long Island, southeastern New York State, and Connecticut. The ...

NAICS:4851
NAICS Definition:Urban Transit Systems
Employees:21,522
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
RATPgroup

RATPgroup

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Metropolitan Transportation Authority

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Urban Transit Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RATPgroup in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Urban Transit Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metropolitan Transportation Authority in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - RATPgroup (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RATPgroup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Metropolitan Transportation Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metropolitan Transportation Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
RATPgroup

RATPgroup

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MET10309123

FAQ

Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between RATPgroup and Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between RATPgroup and Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - RATPgroup or Metropolitan Transportation Authority ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - RATPgroup or Metropolitan Transportation Authority ?
Between RATPgroup and Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between RATPgroup and Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84411
SUMMARY

The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105051
SUMMARY

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 1.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.5
CVE-2026-105050
SUMMARY

PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105049
SUMMARY

Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105048
SUMMARY

The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2