Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

RATPgroupRATPgroup
VS
Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityMetropolitan Transportation Authority
RATPgroup

RATPgroup

54 Quai de la Rapée PARIS, 75012, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://ratpgroup.com
772/1000Fair

The RATP Group is the world's third largest public transport company, carrying 12 million people every day in France and around the world. It boasts unrivalled experience in design, project management, operation and maintenance of all types of urban and suburban transpo...

NAICS:4851
NAICS Definition:Urban Transit Systems
Employees:10,001
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Metropolitan Transportation Authority

2 Broadway, New York, 10004, US

Last Update: 27/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://new.mta.info/
776/1000Fair

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority is North America's largest transportation network, serving a population of 15.3 million people in the 5,000-square-mile area fanning out from New York City through Long Island, southeastern New York State, and Connecticut. The ...

NAICS:4851
NAICS Definition:Urban Transit Systems
Employees:20,625
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
RATPgroup

RATPgroup

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Metropolitan Transportation Authority

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Urban Transit Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RATPgroup in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Urban Transit Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metropolitan Transportation Authority in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - RATPgroup (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RATPgroup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Metropolitan Transportation Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metropolitan Transportation Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
RATPgroup

RATPgroup

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MET10309123

FAQ

Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between RATPgroup company and Metropolitan Transportation Authority company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between RATPgroup and Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between RATPgroup and Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - RATPgroup or Metropolitan Transportation Authority ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - RATPgroup or Metropolitan Transportation Authority ?
Between RATPgroup and Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between RATPgroup and Metropolitan Transportation Authority, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA