Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

RATH Life SafetyRATH Life Safety
VS
Bharat Heavy Electricals LimitedBharat Heavy Electricals Limited
RATH Life Safety

RATH Life Safety

N56 W24720 N. Corporate Circle, Sussex, WI, 53089, US

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile
746/1000Moderate

With over three decades of connecting and protecting people, RATH™ by AVIRE is your reliable and respected provider of emergency products and systems. Our emergency communication product lines are designed to meet industry specific codes. We aim to be the exclusive prov...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:13
Subsidiaries:69
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Siri Fort Road, New Delhi, 110049, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bhel.com
783/1000Fair

Established in 1964, BHEL is one of India's largest engineering and manufacturing enterprises in the energy and infrastructure sectors, and a leading power equipment manufacturer globally. BHEL serves the core sectors of the economy and provides a comprehensive portfoli...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:21,195
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
RATH Life Safety

RATH Life Safety

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RATH Life Safety in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - RATH Life Safety (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RATH Life Safety cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
RATH Life Safety

RATH Life Safety

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between RATH Life Safety company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between RATH Life Safety company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between RATH Life Safety company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between RATH Life Safety company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between RATH Life Safety company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between RATH Life Safety company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between RATH Life Safety company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between RATH Life Safety company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between RATH Life Safety company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between RATH Life Safety company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between RATH Life Safety company and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between RATH Life Safety and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between RATH Life Safety and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - RATH Life Safety or Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - RATH Life Safety or Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited ?
Between RATH Life Safety and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between RATH Life Safety and Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2