Raspect-inspection vs Lazada - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

Comparison Overview

RaSpect

Lazada

RaSpect

133 Wai Yip St, Kwun Tong District, HK

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

https://www.raspect.ai

750/1000Fair

RaSpect is an innovative AI deep tech company focused on smart city solutions, specializing in safety and sustainability for smart buildings and infrastructure. They provide patented AI technology and SaaS solutions for facility management firms, property managers, engi...

NAICS:5112

NAICS Definition:Software Publishers

Employees:27

Subsidiaries:74

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Lazada

51 Bras Basah Road, Singapore, 189554 , SG

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile

Between 800 and 849

https://group.lazada.com/

801/1000Good

About Lazada Group Founded in 2012, Lazada Group is the leading eCommerce platform in Southeast Asia. We are accelerating progress in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam through commerce and technology. With the largest logistics and ...

NAICS:5112

NAICS Definition:Software Publishers

Employees:21,644

Subsidiaries:0

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

RaSpect

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Lazada

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RaSpect in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lazada in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - RaSpect (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RaSpect cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lazada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lazada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

RaSpect

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

Lazada

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between RaSpect company and Lazada company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between RaSpect company and Lazada company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between RaSpect company and Lazada company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between RaSpect company and Lazada company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between RaSpect company and Lazada company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between RaSpect company and Lazada company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between RaSpect company and Lazada company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between RaSpect company and Lazada company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between RaSpect company and Lazada company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between RaSpect company and Lazada company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between RaSpect company and Lazada company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between RaSpect and Lazada, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between RaSpect and Lazada, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - RaSpect or Lazada ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - RaSpect or Lazada ?

Between RaSpect and Lazada, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between RaSpect and Lazada, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451

SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

5.9

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/ultimate-member/vulnerability/wordpress-ultimate-member-plugin-2-13-1-privilege-escalation-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-103342

SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

3.7

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/unlimited-elements-for-elementor/vulnerability/wordpress-unlimited-elements-for-elementor-free-widgets-addons-templates-plugin-2-0-20-cross-site-scripting-xss-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-103065

SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)

CVSS3

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

IMPACT SCORE

4.2

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

https://patchstack.com/database/wordpress/plugin/kirki/vulnerability/wordpress-kirki-plugin-6-3-1-arbitrary-code-execution-vulnerability?_s_id=cve

CVE-2026-105122

SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)

CVSS3

Base Score: 5.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

CVSS4

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

2.5

EXPLOITABILITY

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-105121

SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-10-03

UPDATED

Date2026-10-03

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVSS4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

1.2

REFERENCES